Text
Pendidkan dan Pekerjan Berdasarkan Kualitas Hidup pada Remaja (Gambaran Deskriptif data Riskesdas 2007) (The Levels of Education and Occupation of Adolescence Based On Their Quality of Life (Riskesdas 2007)
Not many studies explored the quality of life (QOL) of adolescence as one of the health status indication. Their Morbidity and behavior problem received more attention. Futhermore, most health variable were treated as dependent variable, influenced by other condition, such as economic status, education or employmen status. This analysis used different approach which treated the QOL, of the analysis was to explore the contribution of the QOL for schooling and employmen for Indonesia youth. Methodology. Respondents for the analysis were 73,646 adolescence aged 15-19, sub-sample of Riskesdas 2007 respondents. Good QOL is defined as not having any problem in anudio visual functionig, mobility, self care, communication, participation and pcychological & interaction. There was 7% of adolescence with QOL problem, defined as havig at lest one problem of the above categories. This analysis had been exploring how the education and employment status of adolescence with problem in their QOL as compared to thoe with good QOL, using table descriptive analysis. There was apparent difference of education and employment status between the adolescence with analysis. There was apparent difference of education and employment status between the adolescence with good QOL and those with QOL problem. Proportion of no schoolingand not finished elementary school, as well as unemployed was higher for those with good QOL problem (14-39.8% vs. 8%) & (27-45% vs 22%), while education level was higher for those with good QOL (68% vs 37.4-61%). QOL problem in audio visual and functioning had worsened the adolescence’s participation in schooling. Disadvantageous was experienced more by adolescence living in rural area. This analysis showed that the QOL had influeneed the education and employment status of adolescence. But without controling socio economic status, the strongest factorsinfluencing education status was economic factor, represented by living in urban or rural area. This analysis showed the importance of collaboration between health sectors and other sector to improve the quality of life of the Indonesia adolescence.
No other version available